Here is the proof, found it myself with the help of a dev friend. You can literally see "Silk blockchain" changed to "Solana blockchain" with motto and all. $LOOM was company name $SILK was blockchain name Both changed to Solana. Both can exist at the same time, but if you are bidding the "blockchain" name, then it's Silk. People might not be interested in narrative at all, but if we are going to recreate Cash Cat narrative on Solana as an answer, it's Silk in my opinion. There will be pvp if people are interested in the narrative, but I'm bidding on this coin: 9y6hXFBFN1fJGfAAYgkXVVfQATG1mEJsmTrCXcT6pump 9y6hXFBFN1fJGfAAYgkXVVfQATG1mEJsmTrCXcT6pump
Evidence timeline
X and Telegram posts, app-native calls and on-chain activity linked to this asset.
Based on proof, Solana's first name wasn't $LOOM. It was $SILK. A @PastelAlpha member made great research on it and found the proof. Loom was company name, Silk was chain's name. Later both renamed to Solana. Proof is in Github.
Here is the proof, found it myself with the help of a dev friend. You can literally see "Silk blockchain" changed to "Solana blockchain" with motto and all. $LOOM was company name $SILK was blockchain name Both changed to Solana. Both can exist at the same time, but if you are bidding the "blockchain" name, then it's Silk. People might not be interested in narrative at all, but if we are going to recreate Cash Cat narrative on Solana as an answer, it's Silk in my opinion. There will be pvp if people are interested in the narrative, but I'm bidding on this coin: 9y6hXFBFN1fJGfAAYgkXVVfQATG1mEJsmTrCXcT6pump 9y6hXFBFN1fJGfAAYgkXVVfQATG1mEJsmTrCXcT6pump
The original post text is unavailable.
@JessCab13723538 There are a lot but I'm in this one: 9y6hXFBFN1fJGfAAYgkXVVfQATG1mEJsmTrCXcT6pump