@abizmind

Value-Trader

50.1 / 100

Calls, results and posting history.

PlatformX / Twitter

Audience2.7K followers

Following966

Observed posts1

Best calls

Ranked by market cap growth after the call.

Source evidence · Sep 20, 06:49 PM UTC

Open tokenToken GMGN Post

ATH touched

1.13×+13.1% peak

Now 1.13×+13.1% · retained

First call: $11.89M
Current: $13.44M
ATH after call: 1.13× +13.1%

1 call · 1 post

Call quality50 / 100Results

Earliness0 / 100Call timing

Market impact54 / 100Market response

Meaningful wins0%Peaks ≥1.5×

Calls1

Calls with results1

Source reputation

Current read50 / 100

Recent posts

Posts published by this account, newest first. Filter the history to posts that contain an attributed call.

VISIBLE POSTS1posts

@abizmindValue-Trader · X / Twitter

Original postSep 20, 06:49 PM

PAID is getting absolutely nuked on price while the protocol underneath it is doing the exact opposite. Since my last check: • +$14.1K fees claimed • +$2.8K protocol revenue • +$1,435 bought & burned • 105.8K $PAID burned in ONE transaction • Latest buyback +27% vs previous • $331K+ lifetime protocol revenue • $322K+ already bought & burned Meanwhile $PAID has fallen to roughly a $15M MC. Price ↓ Revenue ↑ Buybacks ↑ Supply ↓ The market can sell the token. It can’t argue with the cash flow. If UsePaid keeps producing anywhere near this level of activity, eventually the question becomes: How cheap does a revenue-producing token with continuous open-market buybacks have to get before the market notices? CA: 98kfF7rmsg1QDUEoCqNE7g7M1FdrTt92TEp2CLzypump $PAID

Open tokenToken GMGN Post

Sep 20, 06:49 PM

Also posting about $PAID164 independent accounts · 315 posts

Loading…. .